Treeniverstas
Ladataan sovellusta...

Sources and evidence assessment

A citation does not automatically make a claim certain. We assess what the study measured, who was studied, the uncertainty of the result and whether it applies to the user context being discussed.

Last updated:

Source priority

For broad effect claims, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, consensus statements and official guidance are preferred. A single study may be useful but is not treated as the final answer for an entire field.

  • Title, authors, publisher and year are recorded when available.
  • DOI or PMID identifiers are retained when available.
  • Evidence type is an editorial classification, not an automatic truth score.
  • Access dates may be shown for changing web sources.

Evidence and practical recommendations

Research may show an average association or effect in a controlled setting. A practical recommendation combines that evidence with the user’s goal, experience, schedule, equipment and recovery. It is labelled as a recommendation rather than a direct command from a study.

Communicating uncertainty

When evidence is conflicting, indirect or weak, this is stated. Treeniverstas does not fill evidence gaps with confident wording.

Versiotiedot